The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gambling.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, however the world-famous stars were conspicuously consisted of in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable sites using both complimentary casino-style video games and lucrative rewards, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to discuss claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments act as conventional casinos, only without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the business faces allegations of illegal gaming in a New York claim that declares VGW uses celeb endorsers to 'produce a veneer of authenticity' around its product. (See VGW's declaration below)

'I'm unsure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebs from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any distinctions between traditional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where many - but not all - games are totally free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he routinely touts on social networks

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements typically center around the social aspect of the casinos, while leaving out the capacity for real gaming losses.

Others lure consumers with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and estates before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' read the first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never quit.'

The inconsistency between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for free.

'Most social sweeps consumers never ever buy,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online sports betting sites.'

Social gambling establishments offer customers a possibility to play casino-style games with pals. Players have the option to buy worthless currency often referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for genuine cash, but can be used to open various features within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting customers to get other currency known as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's vehicles, planes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker
bit.ly
Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but seven states, which has assisted to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need normally need identification. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to submit mail-in ask for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, thus providing them a reason to try their hands at any number of casino games for an opportunity to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes sites enabled to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a method of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a type of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never have to pay for an opportunity to win rewards. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a vital distinction in between social sweeps and conventional online sports betting websites like casinos.'

Think about the way that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that use them the opportunity to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself does not satisfy the meaning of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring method for promoting all sort of everyday businesses in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are regularly used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many sports betting industry experts, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, thereby suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
bet9ja.com
'They don't last permanently and they're generally not tied to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.
bet9ja.com
'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics commonly related to McDonald's-design sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments offer" casino-like" payouts, generally 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the common payout portion for a temporary marketing sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the profits earned by the business [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, offering consumers the possibility to play casino-style video games for real prizes. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have since been shuttered over claims of prohibited sports betting.

DJ Khaled is among several celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to deal with comparable examination.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have consistently been cited by courts and state chief law officer as essential consider determining that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for illegal gambling.'

Among the gambling establishment industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are forgoing considerable tax and profits opportunities as this gaming changes that conducted through regulated channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the latest lawsuit, which is mainly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'prohibited sports betting business. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as accuseds in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark.

'We usually do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and stay positive about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games throughout many of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, producing not just excellent games, user experiences and home entertainment, however likewise ensuring this is done safely, properly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly common across the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to strongly protect any claim which may be brought against us.'

The problems between traditional online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments could prove bothersome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues desire to forecast a strong stance versus unlawful sports betting - specifically when attempting to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over allegations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting unlawful gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's requests for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also ignored to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have an obligation to discuss to clients the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our service practices more broadly,' the representative stated. 'Some of our values are" our gamers come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious prohibited sports betting sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by customers who declare harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in prohibited sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton