Determining fair market price (FMV) can be a complicated procedure, as it is extremely depending on the particular facts and circumstances surrounding each appraisal task. Appraisers must work out professional judgment, supported by reliable data and sound methodology, to determine FMV. This often needs cautious analysis of market trends, the accessibility and dependability of comparable sales, and an understanding of how the residential or commercial property would perform under normal market conditions including a prepared buyer and a ready seller.
bloglines.com
This article will address figuring out FMV for the intended use of taking an income tax reduction for a non-cash charitable contribution in the United States. With that being stated, this approach applies to other intended uses. While Canada's meaning of FMV varies from that in the US, there are lots of resemblances that permit this general methodology to be used to Canadian functions. Part II in this blogpost series will resolve Canadian language specifically.

Fair market value is defined in 26 CFR § 1.170A-1( c)( 2) as "the cost at which residential or commercial property would change hands between a ready purchaser and a willing seller, neither being under any obsession to buy or to sell and both having sensible knowledge of pertinent facts." 26 CFR § 20.2031-1( b) broadens upon this definition with "the fair market price of a specific item of residential or commercial property ... is not to be identified by a forced sale. Nor is the fair market worth of a product to be identified by the price of the product in a market other than that in which such product is most commonly offered to the general public, taking into consideration the place of the product any place appropriate."

The tax court in Anselmo v. Commission held that there must be no difference between the definition of fair market price for different tax usages and therefore the combined definition can be used in appraisals for non-cash charitable contributions.

IRS Publication 561, Determining the Value of Donated Residential Or Commercial Property, is the finest starting point for guidance on figuring out reasonable market price. While federal policies can appear challenging, the present variation (Rev. December 2024) is just 16 pages and utilizes clear headings to assist you discover crucial details rapidly. These principles are likewise covered in the 2021 Core Course Manual, starting at the bottom of page 12-2.

Table 1, discovered at the top of page 3 on IRS Publication 561, provides an essential and succinct visual for determining fair market price. It lists the following factors to consider presented as a hierarchy, with the most dependable signs of identifying fair market price listed first. To put it simply, the table is presented in a hierarchical order of the greatest arguments.

1. Cost or selling cost

1. Sales of similar residential or commercial properties
2. Replacement cost
3. Opinions of professional appraisers
   
   Let's explore each consideration individually:
   
   1. Cost or Selling Price: The taxpayer's cost or the actual asking price gotten by a qualified organization (a company eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions under the Internal Revenue Code) may be the very best indicator of FMV, specifically if the transaction occurred near to the valuation date under normal market conditions. This is most reputable when the sale was recent, at arm's length, both parties knew all appropriate truths, neither was under any compulsion, and market conditions stayed stable. 26 CFR § 1.482-1(b)( 1) defines "arm's length" as "a deal in between one celebration and an independent and unassociated celebration that is carried out as if the 2 parties were strangers so that no conflict of interest exists."
   
   This lines up with USPAP Standards Rule 8-2(a)(x)( 3 ), which states the appraiser should provide sufficient information to suggest they abided by the requirements of Standard 7 by "summarizing the results of evaluating the subject residential or commercial property's sales and other transfers, agreements of sale, alternatives, and listing when, in accordance with Standards Rule 7-5, it was necessary for credible task results and if such info was readily available to the appraiser in the regular course of service." Below, a remark further states: "If such details is unobtainable, a declaration on the efforts carried out by the appraiser to get the information is needed. If such info is unimportant, a declaration acknowledging the presence of the info and citing its lack of significance is required."
   
   The appraiser should ask for the purchase cost, source, and date of acquisition from the donor. While donors might be reluctant to share this information, it is required in Part I of Form 8283 and likewise appears in the IRS Preferred Appraisal Format for items valued over $50,000. Whether the donor declines to supply these information, or the appraiser identifies the info is not pertinent, this should be plainly documented in the appraisal report.
   
   2. Sales of Comparable Properties: Comparable sales are one of the most reputable and commonly used techniques for determining FMV and are specifically convincing to intended users. The strength of this approach depends upon numerous crucial factors:
   
   Similarity: The closer the equivalent is to the donated residential or commercial property, the more powerful the evidence. Adjustments must be made for any distinctions in condition, quality, or other value pertinent quality. Timing: Sales need to be as close as possible to the appraisal date. If you use older sales information, first verify that market conditions have actually stayed steady and that no more recent similar sales are readily available. Older sales can still be used, but you need to adjust for any changes in market conditions to show the current value of the subject residential or commercial property. Sale Circumstances: The sale should be at arm's length in between notified, unpressured . Market Conditions: Sales should occur under normal market conditions and not during abnormally inflated or depressed durations.
   
   To choose suitable comparables, it is very important to completely understand the definition of reasonable market worth (FMV). FMV is the rate at which residential or commercial property would change hands between a prepared buyer and a ready seller, with neither celebration under pressure to act and both having affordable understanding of the realities. This meaning refers specifically to actual completed sales, not listings or estimates. Therefore, just offered outcomes must be used when identifying FMV. Asking rates are simply aspirational and do not reflect a consummated transaction.
   
   In order to choose the most typical market, the appraiser must think about a broader overview where similar previously owned products (i.e., secondary market) are offered to the general public. This typically narrows the focus to either auction sales or gallery sales-two distinct marketplaces with various characteristics. It is necessary not to combine comparables from both, as doing so stops working to plainly determine the most common market for the subject residential or commercial property. Instead, you should consider both markets and after that choose the finest market and include comparables from that market.
   
   3. Replacement Cost: Replacement cost can be thought about when identifying FMV, however only if there's an affordable connection between an item's replacement expense and its reasonable market worth. Replacement cost describes what it would cost to replace the product on the valuation date. In most cases, the replacement cost far exceeds FMV and is not a reputable indicator of worth. This approach is utilized infrequently.
   
   4. Opinions of professional appraisers: The IRS permits expert opinions to be considered when identifying FMV, however the weight offered depends upon the professional's certifications and how well the opinion is supported by realities. For the viewpoint to bring weight, it should be backed by credible evidence (i.e., market information). This approach is used rarely. Determining fair market worth involves more than using a definition-it requires thoughtful analysis, sound method, and reputable market data. By following IRS guidance and considering the facts and scenarios linked to the subject residential or commercial property, appraisers can produce conclusions that are well-supported. Upcoming posts in this series will even more check out these concepts through real-world applications and case examples.