For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a good friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and annunciogratis.net it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, wiki.whenparked.com and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, suvenir51.ru consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to widen his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated products to human customers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, forum.altaycoins.com and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative functions should be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful but let's construct it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its finest carrying out markets on the vague promise of growth."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them certify their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library containing public information from a broad variety of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, iuridictum.pecina.cz but he is stated to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, visualchemy.gallery I think that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.